HOW WOULD I EVALUATE MY OWN WRITING PROCESS AGAINST THIS ADVICE?

According to the book and the video, I think I can evaluate my own writing following these steps:

• use context and examples 
• use themes
•  link and signpost

(open university book)

Also, I consider that it is very important taking into account the five essential components of the critical thinking, firstly the logic and argumentation, which seems to be the same but it they are not. In our last writig task we had to talk about: Define what we mean by behavourist and communicative approaches to the devlopment of pronunciation.

The part of argumentation allows to clafiry and defend my claims, it is essential that the argument and the logic involves my premises. In this order, first I would write according to the context of the topic, give a theoretical and view and the context of English in Espinal. Also, going through the main concepts and using them to demonstrate differences and similarities related with pronunciation. Then I would use linking words and signposting to connect my ideas. These would make clear to my readers both concepts and how my argument progresses logically from one point to the next and how each new point is relevant.